A family has filed complaints alleging that a shooting incident involving a woman in a vehicle did not pose an immediate threat to the shooter, contradicting claims of self-defense. The accusations center on the circumstances surrounding the three shots fired into the car, raising questions about whether the use of force was justified. Legal proceedings may now examine the details of the confrontation to determine accountability. The case highlights ongoing debates over the application of self-defense laws in contentious situations.


According to complaints filed by Good's family, Ross was not in any danger when he fired three shots into her car.