Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has sparked controversy with an unusual move in a recent dissenting opinion. In a decision that has left legal experts scratching their heads, Alito's dissent contained two footnotes, but unlike the usual practice, they were not assigned numbers. This unconventional approach has raised questions about the justice's intentions and potential implications for the court's precedent. As the debate rages on, many are left wondering whether this was a deliberate choice or simply an oversight, and what it may say about the current state of the Supreme Court.
Justice Alito's dissent had two footnotes, but they were not numbered.
