A federal appeals court judge has been accused of dismissing two cases from Missouri without fully reviewing the submitted documents, raising concerns about procedural fairness in the judicial process. The allegations suggest that the judge may have made decisions without thorough consideration of the legal arguments presented. Legal experts are questioning whether such practices undermine trust in the court system. The case highlights broader debates about judicial efficiency versus the need for meticulous review in high-stakes legal matters.
Justice Kavanaugh rules against Missouri twice, likely without even reading all the papers.
