An inquiry into corruption has drawn attention for its sharp legal scrutiny rather than immediate high-profile fallout, with observers noting the meticulous questioning of counsel assisting the proceedings. The hearings have highlighted the intricate details of allegations tied to electoral donations, framing financial influence in politics as a persistent risk. Legal counsel emphasized how money in political spheres can undermine integrity, setting a rigorous standard for examining potential misconduct. While resignations have been scarce, the inquiry’s focus on legal precision suggests a deeper examination of systemic issues at play.
You could be forgiven for thinking the inquiry has been a bit of a damp squib. But high-profile resignations are not the only measure of Icac’s successGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastMany people watching the Independent Commission Against Corruption hearings in Sydney over the past two months have come to admire the forensic questioning of the counsel assisting the inquiry, Peggy Dwyer SC.As she set out the complicated allegations in detail on the opening day in July, Dwyer emphasised the central role of electoral donations laws, observing: “Money in politics, as in other spheres of life, has the potential to corrupt.” Continue reading...
