A quarter-century after the events that reshaped national security priorities, experts suggest that America’s long-standing reliance on a militarized approach to global threats may now be hindering rather than helping its ability to address modern challenges. With shifting geopolitical dynamics and evolving security concerns, there is growing discussion about whether the country can transition from a posture of perpetual readiness to one that prioritizes diplomacy, resilience, and long-term stability. The shift could redefine how the nation responds to crises, both at home and abroad, while also influencing domestic policies like healthcare, infrastructure, and social equity. Critics argue that sustained military engagement has come at a cost—financial, human, and moral—and that rethinking this approach may be essential for sustainable progress.
25 years later, letting go of our permanent fight response may be how America heals
