Hot chicken is OK, but soda isn’t? Battle over SNAP scrambles red-blue politics.

"Federal Judge Blocks State-Level Bans on Using SNAP Benefits for Sugary Drinks In a move that could have significant implications for low-income families, a federal judge has ruled that state-level bans on using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase soda and candy are unconstitutional. The decision comes as several states have implemented such bans in an effort to promote healthier eating habits among those receiving government assistance. However, critics argue that the bans unfairly restrict the choices of those who need the assistance the most, and that the federal government has the authority to regulate the program. The ruling is likely to be appealed, but for now, it appears that SNAP recipients will be able to continue using their benefits to purchase a wide range of food items, including sugary drinks."

Both parties have been enacting state-level bans on using SNAP benefits for soda and candy. On Monday, a federal judge said the new rules violate federal laws governing the food program.