Exam scandals continue to raise concerns about whether reforms to the centralised testing agency are sufficient, prompting calls for a broader reassessment of the entire examination system. Critics argue that repeated incidents of misconduct highlight deeper structural flaws that may not be addressed by incremental fixes. The debate centers on whether the current model—relying heavily on a single agency—can maintain fairness and integrity in high-stakes assessments. With trust in the system under pressure, stakeholders are questioning if fundamental changes are needed to prevent future controversies.
As exam scandals persist, critics ask whether fixing the centralised testing agency is enough or if the model needs to change.
