A Liberal factional figure has dismissed claims that testimony from Dominic Perrottet’s sister-in-law was misleading, arguing her advice on vaping and the greyhound industry was already publicly available. The Independent Commission Against Corruption heard that her alleged $660,999 payment for offering a “mum’s perspective” on lobbying clients was questioned during proceedings. Counsel assisting the inquiry noted that the information she provided was not unique, while the factional figure rejected suggestions her evidence was implausible. The debate centers on whether her background and compensation were appropriately disclosed in lobbying activities.
Counsel assisting inquiry suggests Anita Perrottet’s alleged advice on vaping and greyhound industry was already on public record from other sourcesA Liberal factional figure has rejected a suggestion he gave “ridiculous” evidence that Dominic Perrottet’s sister-in-law shared in $660,999 for giving a “mum’s perspective” on lobbying clients, the New South Wales anti-corruption watchdog has heard.Jeremy Greenwood told the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) on Wednesday it was not relevant that Anita Perrottet’s children were under five at the time she provided advice on vaping among minors. Continue reading...
