The piece argues that targeting a firm simply because it has created a superior product can backfire, harming both the business and its customers. It examines how antitrust regulators, who often justify such actions by citing consumer protection, may actually stifle innovation and market competition. By exploring recent cases and expert opinions, the article questions whether punitive measures against high-performing companies truly serve the public interest or merely punish success.
Punishing a company for building the best product doesn't serve the businesses or users antitrust enforcers claim to protect.