US-Iran Conflict: Senator Raises Concerns Over War's Long-Term Consequences As the US war against Iran enters its third month, Democratic Senator Mark Kelly is speaking out against the ongoing conflict, questioning whether the benefits outweigh the costs. Kelly, a vocal critic of the war, expressed concerns that the prolonged military engagement may leave the US in a weaker position than it would have been without the conflict. The Arizona senator's comments come as the war continues to escalate, with both sides suffering losses and the international community calling for a peaceful resolution. With the war's impact on regional stability and global security still unclear, Senator Kelly's remarks highlight the need for a reevaluation of the US's strategy in the Middle East.
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) on Sunday questioned the basis for the U.S. war against Iran, which recently stretched past its second month, saying “we're going to be in a worse posture than we otherwise would be in if this war in Iran didn't happen.” “Do you think that the U.S. would be able to defend,...