A philosopher argues that while democracy remains the best system compared to authoritarianism, libertarians should not prioritize it as a core principle. Recent developments have underscored persistent criticisms of democratic governance, including its tendency toward majority rule at the expense of individual freedoms. The debate raises questions about whether libertarianism’s focus should shift from defending democracy to addressing its inherent flaws. Critics contend that unchecked democratic processes can undermine the very liberties libertarians seek to protect.
Matt Zwolinski is right to emphasize that democracy is generally superior to authoritarianism, but wrong to suggest it should be a central libertarian commitment. Moreover, recent events highlight the validity and importance of longstanding libertarian critiques of democracy's weaknesses.
