A high-stakes political maneuver has emerged as the Chief’s unexpected resistance to a key case has raised suspicions about potential influence over ACB’s decision-making. Questions linger over whether the Chief’s stance was purely procedural or part of a calculated effort to sway the outcome. Legal and political observers are closely watching how this development could reshape the case’s trajectory. The revelation adds another layer of intrigue to an already contentious process.
It was the Chief, and not KBJ, who was holding up the case. Was he trying to flip ACB's vote?
