Legal experts warn that a newly proposed policy may face significant judicial scrutiny over its sweeping scope, raising concerns about potential overreach. A Minnesota attorney suggests courts could view the measure with skepticism due to its broad language, hinting at possible legal challenges ahead. The debate highlights tensions between legislative intent and judicial interpretation in defining the boundaries of such policies. Critics argue the lack of clear limits could lead to unintended consequences in enforcement.
"I think courts are going to be very suspicious of how broad this is," one Minnesota lawyer tells Reason.
