A new analysis highlights a striking parallel between historical military strategy and recent geopolitical moves, drawing comparisons between ancient Persian campaigns and contemporary diplomatic engagements. The examination suggests that repeated efforts to establish new connections with an adversary—following setbacks in negotiations—may reflect a pattern of overcompensation rather than strategic success. Critics argue that such actions could undermine long-term objectives by reinforcing dependence on a hostile power. The piece explores whether these recurring diplomatic overtures signal a broader shift in foreign policy approach or simply a reaction to repeated failures in deal-making.
Xerxes only built one bridge leading to his defeat. Trump keeps building new bridges to Russia after every negotiating defeat at Putin's hands.
