A proposed online safety bill has raised concerns that its "duty of care" provisions may force digital platforms to censor legal content under the guise of safeguarding minors. Critics argue the measure could lead to overzealous moderation, stifling free expression while attempting to address child protection risks. The debate highlights tensions between regulatory intent and unintended consequences for open discourse. Supporters insist stronger oversight is needed to combat harmful material online.
The bill’s “duty of care” could pressure platforms to suppress lawful speech in the name of protecting children.
