A controversial ruling has sparked backlash from left-wing lawmakers and environmental groups, who argue the move undermines long-standing commitments to sustainability and climate action. Critics contend the decision prioritizes economic interests over ecological concerns, raising questions about its long-term impact on policy and public trust. The debate highlights deep divisions over how to balance development with environmental protection. Supporters, however, defend the choice as necessary for economic stability and job creation.
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from left-wing politicians and environmentalists.
