Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's judicial record has been under scrutiny since her appointment, with many looking to her past writings for insight into her future decisions. A recent review of her work reveals that Barrett's views on the Free Exercise Clause, a cornerstone of the First Amendment that protects individuals' right to practice their faith, were shaped two decades ago. In a 2003 law review article, Barrett expressed concerns about the Court's interpretation of the clause, suggesting that it had become overly broad and potentially infringing on the rights of those with minority faiths. As the Court continues to grapple with issues of religious freedom, Barrett's stance on this critical issue is likely to have significant implications for the future of American jurisprudence.
Justice Barrett's views on the Supreme Court's supervisory power were set two decades ago; what about her views on the Free Exercise Clause?
