A growing controversy surrounds Meta’s alleged bias in handling political content, with critics claiming the platform has suppressed posts linked to President Lula’s campaign while allegedly giving preferential treatment to his opponent. The accusations suggest uneven enforcement of content policies, raising concerns about transparency and fairness in how social media influences elections. Supporters argue the company’s moderation practices may be disproportionately affecting one side of the political spectrum. The debate highlights broader questions about corporate influence over public discourse during electoral periods.
Critics have accused the tech giant Meta of censoring the political campaign of President Lula and favouring Bolsonaro.
